State of Michigan

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Lansing

JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM

governor

REBECCA  A. HUMPHRIES

director

 


 

 

BILL ANALYSIS

 

BILL NUMBER:

SENATE BILL 440, SUB S-1, AS REPORTED

SENATE BILL 441, SUB S-1, AS REPORTED

SENATE BILL 442, SUB S-1, AS REPORTED

 

TOPIC:

Protect the Right to Hunt and Fish

SPONSOR:

Senator Patricia Birkholz (SB 440),

Senator Randy Richardville (SB 441)

Senator Gerald Van Woerkom (SB 442)

 

CO-SPONSORS:

Senators Gilbert, Pappageorge, Jelinek, Patterson, Kuipers, McManus, Garcia, Stamas, Jansen, Kahn, Basham, and Prusi

 

COMMITTEE:

Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs

Analysis Done:

May 18, 2007

POSITION

The Department supports the protection of hunting, trapping, and fishing for all citizens and can support these bills if they are amended by substituting “privilege” for “right.”  This assures the ability to manage wildlife resources for sustainable habitat and sustainable populations, without increasing avenues for legal challenge.

PROBLEM/BACKGROUND

As the level of participation in hunting, trapping, and fishing declines, the concern regarding the need to legally protect these recreational activities from anti-hunting and anti-fishing threats increases.

DESCRIPTION OF BILL

Senate Bills 440 through 442 would amend various parts of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act to require that the Department of Natural Resources (Department) and the Natural Resources Commission (NRC) protect the people’s right to hunt, trap, and fish lawfully.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

Pro

The legislation makes a strong statement as to the importance and value of hunting, trapping, and fishing.  The Department strongly supports these activities.

 


Con

This legislation creates an invitation for litigation and challenges to the Department for necessary management actions that may be perceived to restrict hunting, trapping, or fishing.

 

The bills each reference and recognize hunting, trapping, and fishing as “rights.”  SB 442 requires the Department, in furtherance of Article IV, Section 52 of the State Constitution, to protect and promote the people’s right to lawfully hunt, trap, and harvest game.  The Michigan Constitution, however, does not establish such a right.

 

State Constitution (Excerpt)

Constitution of Michigan of 1963

§ Natural resources; conservation, pollution, impairment, destruction.

Sec. 52.

 

The conservation and development of the natural resources of the state are hereby declared to be of paramount public concern in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the people. The legislature shall provide for the protection of the air, water, and other natural resources of the state from pollution, impairment, and destruction.

 

Hunting, trapping, and fishing are privileges.

FISCAL/ECONOMIC IMPACT

Are there revenue or budgetary implications in the bill to--

(a)      Department

Budgetary:   

None

Revenue:     

None

Comments:  

There may be increased costs due to legal challenges.

(b)     State

Budgetary:   

None

Revenue:     

None

Comments:  

None

(c)      Local Government

Comments:

None


 

OTHER STATE DEPARTMENTS

The Office of the Attorney General is likely to have concerns with this legislation.

ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

The Department suggests amending the bills by substituting “privilege” for “right.”  While we support protection of these recreational activities, we are concerned with implying a “right” by way of statute.  Doing so will create the specter of increased legal challenges to necessary Departmental management decisions.

Similar bills have been introduced in recent legislative sessions that proposed amendments to the State Constitution to advance protection of hunting, trapping, and fishing rights.

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES IMPACT

None

 

 

_______________________________

Rebecca  A. Humphries

Director

 

_______________________________

Date

WLD/FI